Feedback on Grist.org Move
My post about Grist.org moving to WordPress received a lot of feedback from the community and a long response and explanation from Matt Perry of Grist (thanks, Matt, for taking the time to join the discussion). Matt wanted to clarify their continued involvement in the community:
We’ve loved being a part offended the EE community over the past few years, and plan on staying active as both EE/CI users and coders—we still have CodeIgniter apps in production. So—if our announcement sounded overly-brusque or dismissive of Ellis Labs or the community in any way, please know that it certainly wasn’t meant that way.
He noted that there were a couple of things that made them move:
- the availability (or not) of highly managed, platform-specific enterprise hosting. EE does not yet have a comparable, truly enterprise-scale hosting solution for media companies in particular (see http:vip.wordpress.com)
- Weaknesses in EE’s caching layer and scaling.
Read the thread to follow the entire discussion. I do, however, want to highlight part of a comment from Aaron Waldon:
To address the main issue about Grist.org moving to WordPress, good for them! At the end of the day, the CMS is a means to an end. If they feel the move will be advantageous, I am glad they are doing so and I genuinely hope it works out well for them.
As a community, we should not be offended when a company switches technologies. After all, it is not a personal attack on EE or its user-base. They didn’t pillage our proverbial village or threaten our livelihood. Not all companies are the same and not all end goals are the same. No big deal.
Agreed.
Share on Twitter
Matt Spencer — 21:35 on 05.10.2012
It is common to see companies switching platforms to better suit their needs, and we cannot condemn them for doing so because no CMS is perfect for every organization